Chicago Automobile Trade Association

Huge disconnect emerging between car buyers, U.S. government

August 26, 2016
The U.S. government has mandated higher average fuel economy from automakers, and the clock is ticking. New standards are supposed to be met by 2025.
Meanwhile, the U.S. auto industry is in the midst of a sales boom that’s being driven by highly profitable big pickup trucks and SUVs. These are not vehicles that deliver high mpg.
And that’s the problem. For decades, the government has been focused on getting more fuel-efficient cars on the road, for a variety of reasons, ranging from ended a dependence on imported oil to improving the environment. 
But now consumers in droves are buying vehicles that don’t help to achieve those objectives. And the car makers are loving it because they’re making so much money. The last thing they want is to build cars that nobody wants to buy. They also want to avoid adding technologies to trucks and SUVs that will make those vehicles cost more.
Brent Snavely, an automotive reporter for the Detroit Free Press, summed it all up:
The auto industry, environmentalists and government regulators are in the middle of reviewing possible changes to regulations that will influence how automakers spend billions over the next decade.
For consumers, the outcome of the regulatory battle ultimately will determine what kind of cars automakers develop and sell. 
More aggressive regulations are likely to force automakers to develop cars that get better fuel economy, or electric and hybrid cars with a better range, as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions, which is better for the environment. … Despite pleas from the auto industry, the federal government issued a report last month that kicked off a yearlong review process of the standards that concluded that very little needs to be changed. … 
The technical assessment report did conclude automakers likely would only reach an average of 50 mpg to 52.6 mpg instead of a fleet-wide target of 54.5 mpg for all automakers by 2025.
A winning case?
The automakers have a pretty good case here. They aren’t bucking the government’s mandate because they can’t keep up technologically. If Ford, GM, Honda, or Toyota wanted to put hundred of thousands of additional hybrids and electric cars on the road, they could. The technology isn’t mysterious or difficult.
They simply point to the SUVs and trucks that are selling, and what’s possible in terms of fuel economy and costs, and contrast the positive picture with the vehicles that aren’t selling — the small cars and alternative-propulsion machines that look good on paper but can’t hack it in the marketplace.
Automakers are fairly asking why the government wants to stick to a plan that reduces car company profits at a time when two major U.S. players, GM and Chrysler, are still recovering from their 2009 bankruptcies. Obviously, the market could reverse course. Low gas prices are keeping the US truck-and-SUV boom going. When gas prices have risen in the past, trucks have fallen out of favor.
But they tend to come back because America likes large vehicles. So shifting away from these products is never a good business plan if the hope is to succeed in the U.S. market, which is the world’s most competitive. Automakers have done of good job of balancing what the government wants with what customers will buy. But meeting that balance could be more difficult in the future. 


Copyright © 2010 Chicago Automobile Trade Association. All Rights Reserved.